Evaluating e-Government Services in Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research Using the EGOVSAT Model

https://doi.org/10.24017/science.2016.1.2.2

Abstract views: 3081 / PDF downloads: 1119

Authors

  • Bryar A. Hassan 1Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research, Department of Information Technology, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Aram M. Ahmed 1Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research, Department of Information Technology, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
  • Soran A. Saeed Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Technical College of Engineering
  • Awin A. Saeed Gorannet Company for Internet and Broadband Services

Abstract

Office automation is an initiative used to digitally deliver services to citizens, private and public sectors. It is used to digitally collect, store, create, and manipulate office information as a need of accomplishing basic tasks. Azya Office Automation has been implemented as a pilot project in Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research (KISSR) since 2013. The efficiency of governance in Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research has been improved, thanks to its implementation. The aims of this research paper is to evaluate user satisfaction of this software and identify its significant predictors using EGOVSAT Model. The user satisfaction of this model encompasses five main parts, which are utility, reliability, efficiency, customization, and flexibility. For that purpose, a detailed survey is conducted to measure the level of user satisfaction. A total of sixteen questions have distributed among forty one users of the software in KISSR. In order to evaluate the software, three measurement have been used which are reliability test, regression analysis and correlation analysis. The results indicate that the software is successful to a decent extent based on user satisfaction feedbacks obtained by using EGOVSAT Model.

Keywords:

Office Automation, e-Organization, User Satisfaction, EGOVSAT Model

References

[1] Ministry of Planning, "Kurdistan Region of Iraq 2020: A Vision for the Future" [Online]. Available:www.ekrg.org/files/pdf/KRG_2020_last_english.pdf [Accessed: Aug. 19, 2016].
[2] AbPro Company, "Aza Office Automation" [Online].Available: www.abprosoft.com [Accessed: Aug. 31, 2016].
[3] About Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research (KISSR), "Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research (KISSR)" [Online]. Available: www.kissr.edu.krd [Accessed: Jul. 2, 2016].
[4] T. A. Horan and T. Abhichandani, "Evaluating user satisfaction in an e-government initiative: results of structural equation modeling and focus group discussions," Journal of information technology management, vol. 17, p. 33, 2006.
[5] L. Wang, S. Bretschneider, and J. Gant, "Evaluating web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach," in System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2005, pp. 129b-129b.
[6] E. S. Alias, S. H. M. Idris, N. S. Ashaari, and H. Kasimin, "Evaluating e-government services in Malaysia using the EGOVSAT model," in Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI), 2011 International Conference on, 2011, pp. 1-5.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI.2011.6021740
[7] Y. Liu, C. Zhou, and Y. Chen, "Customer satisfaction measurement model of e-government service," in Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics (SOLI), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 2010, pp. 419-423.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2010.5551542
[8] N. M. Yaghoubi, A. Haghi, and S. Asl, "e-Government and citizen satisfaction in Iran: Empirical study on ICT offices," World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 12, pp. 1084-1092, 2011.
[9] L. Carter and F. Belanger, "Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives," in System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2004, p. 10 pp.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265306
[10] N. Zlatareva and A. Preece, "State of the art in automated validation of knowledge-based systems," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 7, pp. 151-167, 1994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-4174(94)90034-5
[11] Bau, Jason, et al. "State of the art: Automated black-box web application vulnerability testing." 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2010.27
[12] J. Bau, E. Bursztein, D. Gupta, and J. Mitchell, "State of the art: Automated black-box web application vulnerability testing," in Security and Privacy (SP), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, 2010, pp. 332-345.
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2010.27
[13] T. A. Horan, T. Abhichandani, and R. Rayalu, "Assessing user satisfaction of e-government services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS)," in System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 2006, pp. 83b-83b.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.66
[14] R. Danila and A. Abdullah, "User's Satisfaction on E-government Services: An Integrated Model," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 164, pp. 575-582, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.148
[15] D. G. Bonett and T. A. Wright, "Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning," Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 36, pp. 3-15, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960
[16] M.-T. Puth, M. Neuhäuser, and G. D. Ruxton, "Effective use of Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient," Animal Behaviour, vol. 93, pp. 183-189, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.003
[17] J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441

Downloads

How to Cite

[1]
B. A. Hassan, A. M. Ahmed, S. A. Saeed, and A. A. Saeed, “Evaluating e-Government Services in Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research Using the EGOVSAT Model”, KJAR, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–7, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.24017/science.2016.1.2.2.

Article Metrics

Published

18-12-2016

Issue

Section

Pure and Applied Science